CO129-440 - Others & Individuals - 1916 — Page 48

tot

Where

admired

doubt

whellen

Courts

amy. the M. Kong

would give

such a

t

this

constructions

rende

should

farb

sections

you

legislation with

amy

arending

a viur

to removing

fossibility

31.

question

Lorfeiting

for ou

amany

Jove in

A

a

ޑނޑު

of doubt

of

amy

the

of goods

comung

لهم

seizure and

dastemad

from

struct sense

firm included

Statutory from

view of

Four

advised

wh.

ab

List requires

the point of

international laut.

this

aspect

that

follows

(a) on the

are

of fuiss

List

J

I am

the frontion

cabl

actually

of goods the property the Statutong forfeiture of the

Ov

either unden

Goods

of Corde

aminy

further

to meet

bre. !!

22 of 1915 of

Bralce.

udtee

fassed

the doubt referred

in fara. I of this dash;

would be

inconsistent with

& which are taimed

or destined for.

from

pian an enemy or a firm

the Statutory

dest

an

The principles land down in to preceding Jara (1) also apel in the case of goods

international law.

(+)

wh are

every

47

The forfeiture of goods

the property of

the

strict seaml

British law

under

but such goods

legitimate

Cammot

Be

forfeited otherwise

tham by

A

decision of a

Prize Count

(c) Goodo

w

are

forefarty of a farson or

Aseriding

Emfure

with

or

im

the

Bi

carrying on

Beretish

Athe

therefore cubject to Brutal jurisdiction

cam, consistently international

law,

by a count the than a Rise Corest

forfeited if obtai at fire

fon

if

the local lawel

formity such

Statutory

(d) The procedure of

Lorfaiting

unrighede

abro

be

of goods destined

whi

ane

J

obtained from or for an exomy the frohenty of femmes carrying

Allied

that

on

винитесь

territory

the

im

بكارة

frovided

shipment of t92